ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Pain assessment in non-verbal children with neurocognitive impairment: a review on current tools, challenges, and clinical perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individualized Therapeutic Environments for Pain Management in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain in non-verbal children with neurocognitive impairment (NCI) remains a complex and frequently under-recognized clinical challenge. Accurate pain assessment is essential for effective management, and is often hindered by non-verbal presentation, developmental adaptability, and the influence of sedation or illness. In response to these challenges, several observational tools have been developed to identify pain-related behaviors in non-verbal children. Among the most widely used tools is the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, which was originally validated in young children and later adapted for use in children with communication barriers. Its revised version included additional behavioral descriptors tailored to children with cognitive impairments (CI). Similarly, the Non-Communicating Children's Pain (NCCP) Checklist was specifically developed for children with CI and provides a structured assessment across multiple behavioral domains. These tools have shown strong clinical utility and reliability, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. Although both FLACC and the NCCP Checklists have proven effective, the latter is more designed to children with significant CI, suggesting a broader set of pain indicators. However, both tools require trained observers and clinical familiarity for optimal use. This review explores the strengths and limitations of these and other pain assessment tools, emphasizing the need for individualized approaches and validated instruments to ensure accurate pain recognition and treatment in pediatric populations, particularly those with NCI, including cases where critical illness further limits communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.