ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2025
Mapping Peak Expiratory Flow in Healthy Pakistani Adults: Insights from Wah Cantt.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory assessments frequently utilize Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) as a fundamental measure of lung function. However, standard reference ranges may not accurately represent variations across different demographic groups. This study aims to address this gap by examining the variability of PEFR among healthy Pakistani adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over a six-month period at a tertiary care hospital in Wah Cantt, Pakistan, involving 400 consenting participants. A consecutive sampling technique was employed. Anthropometric measurements, including height and weight, were obtained using a stadiometer and calibrated weighing scale, respectively. Each participant performed three PEFR maneuvers using a peak flow meter, and the highest value was recorded. Additional data, including age and gender, were collected using a structured proforma. Data was analyzed using SPSS. Results: PEFR showed a strong positive correlation with height (0.616 in males 0.767 in females) and a negative correlation with age (-0.418 in males and -0.115 in females). Male participants exhibited significantly higher PEFR values compared to females. Conclusion: The findings indicate that PEFR is influenced by gender, height, and age. Specifically, males tend to have higher PEFR values; PEFR increases with greater height and decreases with advancing age. These results underscore the importance of considering demographic-specific factors when interpreting PEFR values and support the development of localized reference standards for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.