Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987781›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Differentiation of pulmonary tuberculosis from non-tuberculous solid lung lesions using radiomics and clinical-semantic features on contrast-enhanced CT.

Sunyi Zheng, Jing Wang, Jing Liang, Xiaomeng Yang, Jiaxin Liu, Yanju Li, Pengcheng Wei, Jianyu Xiao, Jaeyoun Yi, Jianwei Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sunyi Zheng *National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jing Wang *School of Public Health, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Jing Liang *National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaomeng YangNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jiaxin LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yanju LiNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Pengcheng WeiDepartment of Radiology, Baoding No. 6 Hospital, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Jianyu XiaoNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jaeyoun YiCoreline Soft, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center, National, Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhaoxiang YeNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaonan CuiNational Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Medical Artificial General Intelligence for Computation (MAGIC) Lab, Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To explore the feasibility of a combined model integrating radiomics and clinical-semantic features for differentiating pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) from non-tuberculous solid lung lesions on contrast-enhanced CT. Methods: In this study, 900 patients enrolled before October 2016 were randomly partitioned into training and internal validation sets at a 3:1 ratio, while those recruited between October 2016 and October 2017 formed an independent temporal validation set. Clinical-semantic features were selected through univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis, while predictive radiomics features were identified using analysis of variance, Spearman correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Binary logistic regression was then used to construct the clinical-semantic, radiomics, and combined models. Model performance was evaluated using average precision (AP) derived from the precision-recall curve, and differences between models were assessed using bootstrap resampling. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Results: Following feature selection, two clinical-semantic and three radiomics features were incorporated into the combined model. This model achieved APs of 0.91, 0.85, and 0.62 in the training, internal validation, and temporal validation sets, respectively, outperforming the clinical-semantic model, which yielded APs of 0.64, 0.61, and 0.41 ( Conclusion: By integrating clinical-semantic and radiomics features, the combined model enables accurate differentiation between PTB and non-tuberculous solid lung lesions, potentially facilitating non-invasive diagnosis and personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

computed tomographymachine learningpulmonary tuberculosisradiomicssolid lung lesion

Identifiers

PMID41987781
PMCPMC13076353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.