Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987713›Full record

SynthesisAnaesthesia2026

Best practice in obstetric general anaesthesia: an umbrella review of pharmacological strategies for induction of general anaesthesia.

Robert Craig, Amelia Carnachan, Kay A Mak, Olivia Beesley, Lauren Borg Xuereb, James E O'Carroll, Sohail Bampoe, Nuala Lucas, Peter M Odor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert CraigDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1062-1234
Amelia CarnachanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Kay A MakDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Olivia BeesleyDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Lauren Borg XuerebDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
James E O'CarrollDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-2276
Sohail BampoeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-4321
Nuala LucasDepartment of Anaesthesia, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-2067
Peter M OdorDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-2703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneral anaesthesia for caesarean delivery carries specific maternal and neonatal risks. Drug choice, dose and timing during induction of general anaesthesia may influence maternal and neonatal physiology and outcomes. The objective of this umbrella review was to systematically identify, summarise and appraise evidence for pharmacological techniques for induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.

methodsDatabases were searched for eligible studies, including meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials not previously synthesised and relevant observational studies. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment and evaluation of evidence certainty were conducted. Interventions were grouped into four categories: induction opioids; induction hypnotics; drugs to obtund the pressor response to laryngoscopy; and neuromuscular blocking drugs.

resultsSeven meta-analyses, two systematic reviews, 26 randomised controlled trials and 15 observational studies were included. Moderate quality evidence indicated short-acting opioids offered maternal haemodynamic benefit without negative neonatal consequences. Low quality evidence indicated propofol was associated with equivalent early neonatal resuscitation requirements compared with thiopental, but with lower risk of maternal accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. Labetalol, dexmedetomidine, lidocaine and remifentanil attenuated maternal haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, with minimal neonatal adverse effects. Rocuronium at dose of ≥ 1 mg.kg DISCUSSION: Current evidence supports the safety of short-acting opioids, propofol as the preferred induction drug and rocuronium as a suitable alternative to suxamethonium during induction of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Overall, the evidence base is constrained by exclusion of high-risk pregnancies and emergency cases, thus limiting generalisability.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidCesarean SectionFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfant, NewbornNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPregnancyAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and SedativesNeuromuscular Blocking Agentscaesarean deliverygeneral anaesthesiaobstetric anaesthesiasystematic reviewumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41987713
PMCPMC13446835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.