ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
The experiences of non-direct patient care genetic counselors in South Africa-A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Having first emerged in the 1970s, genetic counseling is a relatively young profession in South Africa (SA). Historically, genetic counselors (GCs) in SA have been employed through academic and public health institutions, with only a few practicing in private healthcare. Recently there has been a noticeable shift in the employment trends of GCs worldwide and in SA, transitioning away from patient-facing roles and gravitating toward practice in new or expanded roles. It is, therefore, becoming more common to find GCs employed in laboratory, research, and industry settings. These roles typically involve far less direct patient care, redefining the role of a GC. Although this trend has been researched elsewhere, mainly in the United States of America (USA) and Canada, it has yet to be explored locally. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of GCs employed in non-direct patient care (NDPC) such as laboratory, research, and industry-based settings in SA. Using semi-structured interviews, this research gathered data from qualified GCs employed in NDPC positions. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed three themes: No choice but to pivot, Quality of life, and Professional identity. These findings offer new insights into an unexplored topic and offer an in-depth understanding of NDPC GCs based in SA, their motivations that drive this trend, and the evolving professional landscape of genetic counseling in SA. They address the scarcity of patient-facing employment opportunities for qualified GCs, advocate for the inclusion of exposure to roles outside of clinical practice during training and highlight the potential to guide workforce policies to address the employment gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.