ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026
Ontology-driven generation of parameters for health technology assessment models: a prompt engineering study.
Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOntologies support transparent and reproducible conceptual modeling in Health Technology Assessment (HTA), but their population remains resource-intensive and reliant on expert input. This study evaluates the feasibility, reliability, and methodological implications of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to populate ontology individuals for HTA applications.
methodsA factorial experimental framework was developed using the Ontology for Simulation Modeling (OSDi) and three HTA-relevant use cases of varying complexity. Two GenAI systems were evaluated under multiple experimental conditions, including prompting strategy, serialization format, and provision of supporting information. Generated ontology individuals were validated by an HTA expert and assessed across four quality dimensions: consistency, relevance, completeness, and adequacy. Multivariate and regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of experimental factors on quality outcomes and hallucination likelihood.
resultsGenAI systems successfully generated ontology individuals across use cases, although performance varied by quality dimension and experimental condition. Iterative prompting significantly improved completeness, while serialization format strongly influenced reliability, with Turtle serialization associated with substantially lower hallucination likelihood compared with XML. Other factors showed dimension-specific effects, highlighting the multidimensional nature of ontology quality. Errors occurred more frequently in structurally complex ontology components, suggesting a relationship between ontological complexity and generative performance.
conclusionsGenAI-assisted ontology population can enhance the efficiency and scalability of HTA conceptual modeling, enhancing the agility of HTA agencies in exploratory phases. Its effective use requires structured prompting, appropriate representation formats, and expert validation. Further research should evaluate its impact on HTA decision modeling workflows and validation frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.