Observational studyJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
Impact of Tenofovir Alafenamide Sub-Dermal Implant Insertion Site Scarring on Acceptability and HIV Prevention Preferences: A Prospective Cohort Study in Durban, South Africa.
Observational study in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe CAPRISA 018 Phase I trial evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a 110 mg tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) implant for HIV prevention in South African women. This follow-up cohort study, CAPRISA 097, assessed the long-term resolution of implant site reactions (ISRs) after implant removal and explored user acceptability and implant attribute preferences to inform the development of next-generation pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implants.
methodsWomen previously enrolled in CAPRISA 018 were recruited and followed quarterly for 12 months between 13 October 2022 and 27 October 2023. ISR prevalence, severity and resolution were evaluated at each visit. Implant acceptability, implant attribute preferences and PrEP preferences were assessed at enrolment and at month 12.
resultsOf 36 eligible participants, 35 were enrolled a median of 299 days after implant removal (IQR: 243-490). At enrolment, all 35 participants (100%) had ongoing mild (Grade 1) scarring, with additional findings of hyperpigmentation (14%), induration (6%) and hypopigmentation (3%). By study exit, scarring persisted in all participants (median duration: 623 days; IQR: 579-819), while hyperpigmentation and induration remained in two and one participant, respectively. Acceptability ratings for implant visibility were similar at enrolment and month 12 (77.1% vs. 75.0%), as were ratings for pain (68.6% vs. 78.1%). Side effects due to ISRs received the highest "very unacceptable" ratings, in 37.1% of participants at enrolment and 21.9% at study exit. Scarring was considered acceptable by 65.7% of participants at enrolment, increasing to 78.1% at exit. Perceived partner interest in the various PrEP products aligned with participant interest. A palpable 12-month implant was acceptable to most participants, whereas increased length, width or stiffness reduced the likelihood of use. Preferred PrEP options were a 12-monthly implant (38.2% at enrolment vs. 50.0% at month 12), a 6-monthly injection (29.0% vs. 37.5%) and daily oral PrEP tablets (12.0% vs. 3.0%).
conclusionsMild but persistent scarring was observed following TAF implant removal, with limited cases of hyperpigmentation and induration. Despite these local side effects, a 12-monthly implant remained the most preferred PrEP option among women previously enrolled in the TAF implant trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.