ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Contrastive multimodal deep learning for survival prediction in grade 2/3 gliomas.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate survival prediction for grade 2/3 glioma patients remains challenging due to tumor biological heterogeneity and limitations of current prognostic methods that rely on single-modality data.
methodsWe developed a multimodal deep learning framework integrating histopathology whole-slide images, somatic mutations, and clinical-demographic data. A 3-stage training pipeline combined contrastive learning with survival-specific optimization to align cross-modal representations. The framework was trained on 498 grade 2/3 glioma patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and an independent Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) cohort (n = 61).
resultsThe contrastive multimodal model achieved a c-index of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 0.96), significantly outperforming the unimodal models (image-only = 0.76; non-image-only = 0.87) and showing an improvement over the noncontrastive multimodal model (c-index = 0.89), although this difference was not statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated clear survival separation across risk strata (log-rank P = 4.4 × 10-5). Contrastive learning improved representation clustering quality, with silhouette scores increasing from 0.20 to 0.24 (P = .05). External evaluation on the DHMC cohort achieved a c-index of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.77 to 0.95) after domain adaptation.
conclusionContrastive multimodal learning significantly enhances survival prediction in grade 2/3 gliomas by effectively integrating histopathology, genomics, and clinical data. This annotation-free approach enables early risk stratification using routinely collected data and shows promise for informing personalized treatment decisions and clinical trial stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.