Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987573›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

From atoms to fragments: a coarse representation for efficient and functional protein design.

Leonardo V Castorina, Christopher W Wood, Kartic Subr

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo V CastorinaAstraZeneca UK, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4247-4883
Christopher W WoodSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-3105
Kartic SubrSchool of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7302-4383

Funding

aRoyal Society University ResearchLeonardo CastorinaUKRI via the Centre for Doctoral Training in Biomedical AI. Kartic Subr
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAlthough deep learning has accelerated protein design, current protein representations such as sequences or full-atom structures scale non-linearly with protein length. We propose a sparse and interpretable representation for proteins, based on evolutionarily conserved fragments. Specifically, we use a curated set of 40 functional and evolutionarily conserved fragments as an alphabet to build Fragment Graphs and Fragment Sets. These fragment-based representations are both lightweight and functionally informative, capturing up to 55% more variance using fewer than 13 of the dimensions required by traditional methods.

resultsOn a dataset of 215 functionally diverse proteins, our approach creates more coherent functional clusters than traditional sequence- and structure-based methods, even among proteins with ≤30% sequence identity. Fragment-based searches of protein databases achieve accuracies comparable to traditional methods, while using 90% fewer tokens per protein. These searches execute ∼68.7× faster than RMSD-based structural methods and ∼1.64× faster than sequence-based methods, even including fragment pre-processing overhead. Additionally, we show that our representation effectively guides RFDiffusion for protein backbone generation with functional recovery rates higher than 40%. In summary, our fragment-based representation offers a scalable and interpretable alternative for the next generation of protein design tools for backbone design, sequence design, and functional similarity searches within protein structure databases. AVAILABILITY: https://github.com/wells-wood-research/tessera.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein EngineeringProteinsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningProtein ConformationSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID41987573
PMCPMC13148958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.