ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
A Four-Item Risk Score to Target Acute HIV Infection Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Indonesia: Development and Validation in the INTERACT Prospective Cohort.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Four-Item Risk Score to Target Acute HIV Infection Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Indonesia: Development and Validation in the INTERACT Prospective Cohort.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIndonesia has an escalated HIV epidemic among key populations, especially men who have sex with men (MSM). Diagnosis and immediate treatment of acute HIV infection (AHI), the earliest phase with the highest transmission risk, is beneficial for individual health and can reduce onward transmission. To inform whom to test for possible AHI using targeted, risk-stratified HIV-PCR testing, this study evaluated the performance of the validated, seven-item Amsterdam AHI risk score among Indonesian MSM, and developed a locally optimized score.
methodsWe used the INTERACT prospective cohort of MSM (≥16 years) attending sexual health clinics in Jakarta and Bali (May 2023-February 2025) who were tested with add-on Xpert HIV-PCR (Cepheid) if their HIV antibody rapid testing was negative or inconclusive. We used generalized estimating equation models to generate risk scores, combining symptoms, risk factors and socio-demographics. The optimized risk score was internally validated using bootstrap resampling. We calculated area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity (ISRCTN41396071).
resultsAmong 1887 individuals, 20 were diagnosed with AHI, and 1867 tested AHI negative across 3446 test visits. The Amsterdam score yielded an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90) with a sensitivity of 85.0% (64.0%-94.8%) and a specificity of 59.2% (57.5-60.8). The optimized risk score included one symptom (fever <2 weeks), one risk factor (condomless receptive anal intercourse <6 months) and two socio-demographic characteristics (age 16-30 years, not having received higher education), and achieved an AUC of 0.91 (0.87-0.96) with a sensitivity of 100% (83.9-100) and a specificity of 65.3% (63.6%-66.8%). Internal validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (0.67-0.97). Applying this risk score would classify 35.1% of MSM as eligible for add-on HIV-PCR testing, identifying 83.9%-100% of individuals who have AHI.
conclusionsThis four-item risk score of easily collected variables can facilitate efficient AHI detection in high-yield clinic settings, enhancing opportunities for HIV prevention. In the Indonesian context, younger MSM with lower educational attainment were particularly vulnerable to AHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.