ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Psychological Prehabilitation for People Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous stem cell transplant (AuSCT) improves survival in haematological cancers, yet often involves a lengthy recovery associated with a myriad of psychological and physical challenges. Psychological prehabilitation is recommended to improve functional outcomes by addressing psychological concerns and promoting optimal mental and physical health prior to AuSCT. Despite this, little is known about the implementation and experiences of psychology-specific prehabilitation for AuSCT.
aimsThe current study explores the perspectives and experiences of AuSCT recipients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), regarding optimal psychological prehabilitation.
methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with AuSCT recipients and HCPs experienced in working with AuSCT recipients. AuSCT recipients were recruited at a regional Victorian public health service offering psychological prehabilitation. Purposive sampling was used for HCPs, ensuring a range of professions participated. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on interview data, with triangulation utilised to identify themes.
resultsNine AuSCT recipients and 12 HCPs participated. All themes were shared across AuSCT recipients and HCPs. Four themes (each with subthemes) were identified: Fostering Psychological Preparedness for Transplant (Exploring Expectations, Addressing Psychological Concerns), Getting Through the Long Haul (Prioritising Social Support, Planning Emotional and Practical Care), Strengthening Engagement with Psychology (Destigmatising Psychology, Psychology Enhances Overall Prehabilitation) and Looking Toward Sustainability (Individualised Stepped-Care, Screening and Risks).
conclusionsPsychological prehabilitation is considered crucial for optimal preparation and recovery from AuSCT, however stigma and limited psychology resources can impact access. Future research should investigate sustainable models of psychological prehabilitation, such as stepped care, to adequately meet the needs of this growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.