Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987478›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Phosphorus leaching and runoff risks from non-calcareous sandy soils with a low sorption capacity and high hydrological connectivity.

Maarten van Doorn, Wim de Vries, Debby van Rotterdam, Gerard H Ros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maarten van DoornNutriënten Management Instituut, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9197-5687
Wim de VriesEarth Systems and Global Change Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-0612
Debby van RotterdamNutriënten Management Instituut, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-6261
Gerard H RosNutriënten Management Instituut, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-9770

Funding

Nutriënten Management Instituut (Wageningen)Wetterskip Fryslân (Leeuwarden)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable phosphorus (P) management includes producing food within environmental boundaries for water quality. In regions where environmental boundaries are crossed, it is beneficial to identify P loss hotspots and implement mitigation measures. In this study, we assessed the risk of P losses to shallow groundwater and surface water from agricultural fields on non-calcareous sandy soils with an exceptionally low P sorption capacity and high hydrological connectivity due to shallow groundwater levels and the presence of open trenches. Specifically, we investigated P quantity-intensity relationships in soils from two agricultural fields and monitored groundwater levels and P concentrations in both groundwater and water fluxes from open trenches. The results showed that non-calcareous soils with low sorption capacities reach high P saturation degrees when fertilized to an agronomic optimum based on a P quantity measure. This leads to high reactive P concentrations in soil solution that can be transported to surface water via interflow, overland flow, and land drainage. In these situations, open trenches are a significant P loss pathway because they directly connect the P-saturated topsoil to surface water, leading to P losses ranging from 1.3 to 7.5 kg P ha

Indexed as

PhosphorusSoilSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionAgricultureEnvironmental MonitoringGroundwaterHydrologyPhosphorusSoilSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41987478
PMCPMC13084165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.