SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series Published Between 2015 and 2025 on the Use of Biomaterials for Closure of Oroantral Fistula.
Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oroantral fistulas (OAFs) challenge the clinical decision-making of oral surgeons, requiring selection of an effective biomaterial for successful closure. This systematic review aims to evaluate recent biomaterials and techniques for closing oroantral fistulas, as reported in case reports and series. The goal of this review was to assess how different biomaterials affect the clinical closure of OAFs and oroantral communication. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Multiple scientific databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were comprehensively searched using relevant MeSH terms and Boolean operators. Inclusion criteria were case series, reports, and presentations using biomaterials for OAF closure published between 2015 and 2025, with visibly defined outcomes. Reviews, animal studies, and case series and reports without biomaterial use were excluded. Two independent reviewers performed title/abstract and full-text screening. Data extraction included patient demographics, OAF characteristics, biomaterials used, and outcomes. Narrative synthesis was performed after assessing quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The final assessment of 189 records yielded 18 eligible studies, having patients (age range 20-77 years) with varied etiologies, such as infections and extraction, OAF dimensions, and follow-up periods (9 days to 13 months). Commonly used biomaterials included platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), advanced PRF, collagen membranes, and other grafts. Patient outcomes showed consistent OAF closure, symptom relief, and uneventful healing. Studies represented 12 countries. Variability in reporting OAF characteristics was noted. Diverse biomaterials are effective for OAF closure, with frequent use of PRF and advanced PRF. Consistent reporting of OAF characteristics is essential for future research and improved comparability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.