ArticleGenome biology2026
Benchmarking component choices for unpaired single cell RNA and epigenomic integration.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference Regulatory Element-Guided Gene Expression Analysis for Mechanistic Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking component choices for unpaired single cell RNA and epigenomic integration.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell multi-omics sequencing technologies enable profiling various cellular aspects, offering valuable biological insights. Integrating unpaired multi-omics data, which involves profiling different modalities from distinct cells within the same overall population, remains challenging yet crucial for a comprehensive understanding of cell states and molecular dynamics. Although numerous computational methods for integrating such unpaired data exist, a systematic evaluation of the choices at each step is lacking. The recent emergence of technologies simultaneously profiling multiple modalities within the same cell provides paired datasets, allows for the systematic evaluation of unpaired pipelines.
resultsWe leverage paired scRNA-seq with scATAC-seq and histone modifications (ChIP-seq) to systematically evaluate methods for unpaired scRNA and peak-based epigenomic (ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq) data integration to establish a robust, general pipeline. We benchmark individual steps, including feature linking, dimension reduction, and clustering, and evaluate their combinatorial effects on pipeline performance by testing various choices at each stage. Our findings reveal that while gene activity scores show limited correlation with gene expression, they effectively preserve cellular neighborhoods for clustering. Dimension reduction emerges as the most critical step, with non-linear methods generally offering better performance and linear methods providing robustness. Optimal transport (OT)-based label transfer consistently outperforms other strategies across various embeddings.
conclusionsThis benchmark of unpaired integration provides valuable insights for developing methods suited for increasingly complex multi-omics study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.