ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2026
A comparative study of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based and text-based training in sterile preparation: pilot trial of early-stage clinical VR study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study is a pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) applications in retraining sterile preparation techniques for injectable medications. Specifically, it focused on comparing VR-based learning with conventional text-based learning and objectively assessing students’ acquisition of practical skills using standardized evaluation criteria.
methodsSeventeen pharmacy students voluntarily participated in the study and were divided into two groups: one using a VR application for learning and the other using text-based materials. Immediately after training with their respective tools, students’ aseptic preparation skills were assessed using standardized criteria (including 29 individual evaluation checkpoints) and a 5-point overall rating scale.
resultsStudents who used the VR application completed tasks in a shorter time and scored higher on evaluation criteria such as operational smoothness and drug dissolution within vials. Additionally, multiple assessment items, including “Fill the aseptic smoothly and evenly, without stopping in the middle of the process,” were strongly correlated with the overall practical performance ratings of the VR group.
conclusionsThe introduction of VR applications for aseptic preparation training, which involves complex procedures, suggests that VR-based learning may be more effective than traditional text-based methods in helping students understand procedural workflows and improve operational fluency. These findings indicate that VR technology may serve as a useful educational tool in practical pharmacy training. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
trial registrationNot applicable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.