ArticleGenome biology2026
Prediction of plant phase-separating proteins using positive-unlabeled learning.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical guide to investigating biomolecular condensates: a comment from the plant community.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Prediction of plant phase-separating proteins using positive-unlabeled learning.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation regulates biological processes through dynamic condensates. Despite its significance, experimentally validated phase-separating proteins in plants remain limited, complicating predictions. We overcome this gap by applying positive-unlabeled learning, a semi-supervised approach optimized for imbalanced datasets. Leveraging 6,559 reported plant phase-separating proteins from eight species, we train a model integrating sequence-structural features, enabling prediction of 174,656 high-confidence candidates across 14 species. Experimental validation confirms liquid-liquid phase separation in 67.9% of the candidate proteins from Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. This positive-unlabeled framework demonstrates robust predictive power while providing open resources to advance plant phase separation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.