ArticleBioData mining2026
Distinguishing cancer patients' mild and severe symptoms in radiotherapy via zero-shot and few-shot large language model-based probabilistic prompts.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMonitoring symptom severity during and after radiotherapy (RT) is critical for cancer patient care, however, existing machine learning and deep learning approaches face high retraining costs and lack clinically acceptable explanations. This study aims to investigate effective prompts for LLM-based reasoning and decision-making, distinguishing cancer patients’ mild and severe status during and after radiotherapy across multiple health symptoms.
methodsTo overcome these limitations, we developed a set of few-shot Large Language Model (LLM)-based predictive models operating under an anomaly detection framework (AD-LLM). Our approach leverages six novel, probabilistically designed prompts tailored for AD-LLM to identify and track patients with mild or severe symptoms, enabling accurate prediction despite limited patient-specific data.
resultsExperiments on prostate cancer patients monitoring bowel pain, depression, and sexual dysfunction problems demonstrated AD-LLM’s effectiveness in classifying symptom severity levels using these structured prompts. We evaluate the performance of different prompt strategies using AUC, AUCPR, Precision, Recall, and F1 scores, with confusion matrices and ROC/PR curves visualized to offer insights into LLM reasoning. The reasoning examples of LLMs are also provided to explain and understand their decision-making process.
conclusionThis method provides a promising and explainable solution for real-time symptom monitoring in RT settings, potentially improving timely intervention and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.