ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Delirium in critically ill COVID-19 patients: incidence, predictors, and outcomes in invasive mechanical ventilation with versus without ECMO support.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress in agitation early warning monitoring and new technologies for critically ill patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a frequent and serious complication in critically ill COVID-19 patients, especially those requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Given its negative impact on morbidity and mortality in the ICU, understanding the prevalence, risk factors, and long-term effects of delirium in cardiothoracic ICU patients remains crucial. This study aimed to determine delirium prevalence, identify independent predictors, and assess its association with short- and long-term outcomes in a cohort with a high proportion of prolonged weaning and ECMO support. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-center cohort study, adult COVID-19 patients admitted between March 2020 and December 2021 requiring ≥ 72 h of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and/or ECMO were included. Delirium was assessed retrospectively using daily CAM-ICU scores, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) documentation, and structured chart review to capture hypoactive and hyperactive forms. Clinical data, sedation, analgesia exposure, and ICU management parameters were collected. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors; a second model included ICU length of stay to account for potential bidirectional associations. Time-dependent Cox regression was used in mortality analyses to reduce survivorship bias. Long-term psychological outcomes were evaluated 6–12 months post-discharge.
resultsAmong 102 patients (58 ECMO, 44 IMV only), 53.9% developed delirium. Prevalence was higher in the IMV-only group (63.6%) than in the IMV–ECMO group (46.6%; p = 0.065). Multivariable analysis showed that lack of ECMO support, male sex, and longer duration of invasive ventilation were associated with increased delirium risk. When ICU length of stay was included, only absence of ECMO and ICU length of stay remained significant, while male sex lost significance. Thirty-day survival was higher in delirious patients (p = 0.039), but this was not confirmed for overall survival or in time-dependent analyses. No statistically significant differences were found in long-term psychological outcomes, although no statistically significant differences were observed between patients with and without delirium.
conclusionDelirium is common among prolonged IMV and ECMO COVID-19 patients in cardiothoracic ICUs. Differences in incidence between ECMO and IMV-only patients may reflect differences in care protocols rather than illness severity alone, but no causal conclusions can be drawn from our data. Therefore, we suggest modifying potentially preventative factors such as sedation practices, and emphasize the need for future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.