Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026
The effect of increasing availability of vegetarian meals on their sales in worksite cafeterias: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReducing meat consumption is critical for planetary health and could benefit public health. Restructuring food environments – such as increasing vegetarian meal availability – has been shown to influence dietary choices in online and university canteen settings. However, evidence from more diverse populations is limited.
methodsWe conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial in six English worksite cafeterias over seven weeks. The intervention involved replacing one meat-based meal on the lunch menu with a vegetarian option. Likelihood of selecting a vegetarian meal (primary outcome) was analysed in a logistic regression with random intercept for cafeteria and fixed effect for time. Secondary outcomes included nutritional and sustainability markers (e.g., kilocalories, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions), revenue, and food waste. Interviews with cafeteria staff and customers explored intervention acceptability and barriers.
resultsThe intervention encompassed 26,170 meal sales over 42 site-weeks. The intervention increased the likelihood of selecting a vegetarian meal by 41% [95% CI: 28 to 55]. Per-meal kilocalories were reduced by 26.1 [95% CI -34.4 to -17.7], and per-meal GHGs by 0.16 kg CO2-eq [-0.22 to -0.11]. No significant negative impacts on business outcomes such as cafeteria revenue (-98.43 GBP [-436.03 to 239.17]) or food waste (-8.25 kg [-48.38 to 31.87]; -61.64 GBP [-306.80 to 183.53]) were found. Customers and staff reported that the intervention was acceptable, non-intrusive, and easy to implement, with concerns about customer dissatisfaction and food waste not confirmed by our data. Suggestions for improvement included greater attention to pricing and taste to further encourage uptake.
conclusionsIncreasing the availability of vegetarian meals in cafeterias can significantly shift food choices and reduce environmental impact and calories consumed, without compromising business outcomes, and should be considered an effective strategy for sustainability and public health in diverse food service settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN36918695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.