Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987257›Full record

ArticleOne health outlook2026

Innovating for One Health: federal perspectives and key lessons on building integrative programs for wildlife in Canada.

Alana A E Wilcox, Craig Stephen, Jennifer F Provencher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health outlook, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alana A E Wilcox *Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Ottawa, ON, Canada. alana.wilcox@ec.gc.ca.
Craig Stephen *McEachran Institute, Nanoose Bay, BC, Canada.
Jennifer F ProvencherEcotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At a national level, Canada has committed to advancing the One Health approach, recognizing the interconnection between human, animal, and environment health. One Health, however, has often focused on zoonotic diseases and their impacts on human health, limiting the scope and integration of wildlife and environment health. There is also a growing recognition of the need to develop collaborative strategies to address gaps in research, reflecting diverse expertise and priorities. To explore how One Health is perceived and can be mobilized at the federal level, we conducted a series of focus groups with staff at Environment and Climate Change Canada, discussing themes including novel and innovative program development, metrics of success, and limitations to program development and implementation. Supported by the literature, we describe the four key lessons that emerged for strengthening One Health programming: (1) adopt a settings-based approach to foster inclusivity and optimize the health of people, animals, and the environment; (2) establish a shared goal and / or mandate for a team can create a shared purpose and enhance impact; (3) identify champions and leaders who can drive innovation; and (4) bring in key experts, but maintain flexibility to ensure skills are aligned with program needs. While examples highlight innovative program development and implementation, focus group participants emphasized barriers to collaborative and integrative research on human, animal, and environment health extending beyond federal science and that require institutions to address systemic limitations on research innovation. Nonetheless, to promote optimal health outcomes, including those for wildlife and the environment, professionals can adopt integrative and interdisciplinary approaches and drive a movement from knowledge to action.

Indexed as

Environmental scienceManagement and conservationResearch innovationSystemic barriers

Identifiers

PMID41987257
PMCPMC13196196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.