Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987252›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Factors contributing to 25-year-long retention of South Australian general practitioners in rural practice: a cross-sectional survey.

Richard Watts, Drishti Gupta, Amy Watts, Tharun Kathiravan, Prathicksha Venkatesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard WattsDepartment of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia. Richard.Watts2@sa.gov.au.
Drishti GuptaSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, 4 North Tce, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Amy WattsRACGP Rural Registrar, Angaston Medical Centre, 46 Murray St, Angaston, SA, 5353, Australia.
Tharun KathiravanThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, SA, 5011, Australia.
Prathicksha VenkatesanSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, 4 North Tce, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

backgroundThe difficulty in retaining general practitioners (GPs) in rural and remote parts of Australia is well recognised. Fewer GPs ultimately means patients are more likely to wait longer for GP services, and experience poorer health outcomes as compared to their urban counterparts.

objectivesTo investigate the perceived factors that influenced the long-term retention of GPs in rural South Australia (SA). METHOD/

designCross-sectional survey with questions assessing three main domains of personal, professional and social factors. SETTING AND

participantsGPs who have served twenty-five years in rural areas of SA are presented with a Long Service Award. These GPs were invited to participate over email with the questionnaire sent using Survey Monkey.

main outcome measuresRetention factors were assessed across the domains: personal factors related to demographics, background, training, type of practice; professional factors related to scope of practice and finance, and social factors related to lifestyle and extracurricular activities.

resultsMembers of the Rural Doctors Workforce Agency of South Australia who had served 25 years in rural areas of SA (n = 142) were invited to participate and 60 responded. Three-quarters had rural experience as a medical student and had over 30 years’ experience in rural practice. Involvement in hospital care, emergency medicine/on call, teaching, indemnity support and on-call allowance were the top professional factors perceived as influencing retention. A sense of community, flexible shared after-hours work, regular holidays, friendship groups, community respect, sports, participating in rural students’ elective placement and volunteering were the factors linked to social aspects.

conclusionThe current study sought to identify what factors GPs perceived influenced their decision to practice in rural or remote areas. This is crucial for understanding the key factors the next generation of rural GPs. Promoting rural medical student experience, arrangements with hospital and procedure-related practice, financial support, a shared workload, and a sense of community may encourage GPs to remain and serve in rural areas. Understanding the factors derived from a cohort of long-serving rural GPs is advantageous for policymakers to implement targeted retention strategies tailored to the specific factors.

Indexed as

General PractitionersRural Health ServicesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth AustraliaSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceCommunity healthcareHealth personnelProfessional practiceRural health

Identifiers

PMID41987252
PMCPMC13202836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.