Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987242›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026

Dynamic changes in serum HER2-peptide-specific autoantibodies predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Tatsuya Yoshida, Feifei Wei, Taku Kouro, Kosuke Kawaguchi, Tatsuki R Kataoka, Hiroyuki Yasojima, Hiroko Bando, Takashi Kuwayama, Rikiya Nakamura, Shigenori E Nagai and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tatsuya Yoshida *Department of Breast Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Nanbu Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6963-5827
Feifei Wei *Cancer Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-3255
Taku KouroCancer Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-575X
Kosuke KawaguchiBreast Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-7981
Tatsuki R KataokaDepartment of Pathology, Iwate Medical University, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-8976
Hiroyuki YasojimaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3729-1520
Hiroko BandoDepartment of Breast Thyroid and Endocrine Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-3647
Takashi KuwayamaDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6992-6552
Rikiya NakamuraDivision of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4349-9046
Shigenori E NagaiDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Saitama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-6066
Norikazu MasudaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. nmasuda@alpha.ocn.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-0278
Masakazu ToiTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-9958
Tetsuro SasadaCancer Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. sasada.0980e@kanagawa-pho.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-8833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with anti-HER2 agents is standard for HER2-positive breast cancer, achieving pathological complete response (pCR) in 40–50% of patients; however, reliable predictors of response remain limited. HER2 is an immunogenic antigen capable of eliciting humoral responses, yet the predictive value of HER2-specific autoantibodies in the neoadjuvant setting remains unclear. We investigated whether HER2-peptide–specific antibody responses could serve as potential biomarkers of treatment response.

methodsPaired pre- and post-NAC sera from 112 patients enrolled in the JBCRG-16 (Neo-Lath) trial, which evaluated trastuzumab- and lapatinib-containing NAC, were analyzed. IgG titers against 63 non-overlapping 20-mer HER2-derived peptides were measured using a multiplex bead array, and serum HER2 protein levels were also quantified. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests, Spearman’s correlation analyses, and univariate logistic regression for pCR. Predictive models were constructed using elastic net regression with nested cross-validation across pretreatment, posttreatment, and fold-change datasets, and model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsHER2-derived peptides elicited heterogeneous immune responses, and IgG titers against 37 of 63 peptides (58.7%) significantly decreased after NAC. Pretreatment IgG titers were positively correlated with the Boman index and negatively correlated with the aliphatic index. In univariate analyses, neither IgG titers nor serum HER2 levels at either time point, nor their treatment-induced changes, were significantly associated with pCR. In contrast, a predictive model based on treatment-induced changes in a subset of peptide-specific IgG titers demonstrated consistent predictive performance (AUC 0.78 in training and 0.79 in validation). Six peptides distributed across the HER2 sequence contributed to pCR prediction.

conclusionsDynamic changes in HER2-peptide-specific autoantibodies during NAC, rather than static titers alone, may provide informative biomarkers for predicting clinical response. Serum HER2 levels were not significantly associated with pCR, suggesting that autoantibody profiling may capture response-related biology not reflected by antigen levels alone. These findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that minimally invasive, longitudinal profiling of peptide-specific autoantibodies could complement established response-assessment modalities, such as imaging or molecular assays. However, these results are exploratory and require validation in larger, independent cohorts before clinical application.

trial registrationUMIN000007576 (Registration date: March 26, 2012).

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GLapatinibMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPathologic Complete ResponsePeptidesPrognosisROC CurveAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoglobulin GLapatinibPeptidesTrastuzumabAutoantibodyBreast cancerElastic net regressionHER-2HER2-peptideHumoral immune responseMachine learningNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID41987242
PMCPMC13195858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.