Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987227›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026

Toward a triadic approach in eating disorders: investigating the contribution of the reflexive, affective and interoceptive systems in a clinical data cohort.

Valentin Flaudias, Corentin Gonthier, Aurélien Cornil, Maude Seneque, Clara Lakritz, Sylvain Iceta, Sébastien Guillaume

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03160443 (Impact of Neuropsychological Alteration of Decision-making Abilities on the Functioning of Patients With Eating Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03160443 naunknown statusnot on this map

Impact of Neuropsychological Alteration of Decision-making Abilities on the Functioning of Patients With Eating Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2017 to 2022Enrolled340ConditionsEating DisorderArmsAmbulatory cares in a day-hospital (University Hospital of Montpellier) specialized in the evaluation of eating disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentin FlaudiasUniversité Clermont Auvergne, LAPSCO (UMR CNRS 6024), Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France. valentin.flaudias@uca.fr.
Corentin GonthierLaboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (LPPL UR 4638), Nantes Université, Nantes, F-44000, France.
Aurélien CornilLaboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (LPPL UR 4638), Nantes Université, Nantes, F-44000, France.
Maude SenequeDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital CHU, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Clara LakritzDépartement de Psychiatrie et de Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Sylvain IcetaDépartement de Psychiatrie et de Neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Sébastien GuillaumeDepartment of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital CHU, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Conseil regional des Pays-de-la-Loire and Nantes University Project METABOUFonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRQS Junior 1) 312066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating disorders (ED) are disabling conditions increasingly conceptualized as addictive disorders. While food addiction (FA) is well documented in bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED), its mechanisms in anorexia nervosa (AN) remain unclear. The triadic model of addiction-encompassing reflexive, affective, and interoceptive systems-offers a relevant framework to investigate FA across EDs. The current study aimed to test to what extent these three components of addiction contribute to FA in patients with ED.

methodsThe sample included 115 patients (mean age = 28.41 years, SD = 11.64; 91% female) diagnosed with either AN (restrictive: n = 38; binge-eating/purging type: n = 32), BN (n = 29), or BED (n = 16). Participants completed the Emotional Appetite Questionnaire, the interoceptive subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2, the Detail and Flexibility Questionnaire, and the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0. In the present analyses, FA was operationalized using the continuous total score reflecting FA symptom severity. Additional analyses using the symptom-count and diagnostic scoring procedures yielded comparable results. Linear and multinomial logistic regressions were used to test the associations between FA and the three systems, and their ability to distinguish diagnostic groups.

resultsWhen considered separately, interoceptive difficulties (r = .54), negative emotions (r = .47), and cognitive inflexibility (r = .33) were all associated with higher FA (all ps < 0.001). However, in the joint model, only interoception (β = 0.39, p < .001) and negative emotions (β = 0.33, p = .005) remained significant predictors, whereas cognitive flexibility had no significant effect. These effects did not differ significantly between diagnostic groups. The affective system predicted diagnostic (χ²(3) = 21.78, p < .001), but the effect was inconsistent and the overall predictive value was modest (McFadden's R² = 0.11, classification accuracy = 50%).

conclusionInteroceptive and affective systems appear to significantly predict FA across various ED; the reflexive system, as currently measured, seems to play a more limited role. These results highlight the need for more sensitive assessment tools and refined models of ED-related addictive dimensions. Trial Registration NCT03160443, first post 2017-05-03.

Indexed as

Cognitive flexibilityEating disordersEmotionFood addictionInteroception

Identifiers

PMID41987227
PMCPMC13267506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.