ArticleBMC medicine2026
Detection rate and mutational landscape in extracranial arteriovenous malformations: a cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Somatic Driver to Molecular Therapy in Retinal, Choroidal and Periocular Vascular Disease: Mosaicism, Targetable Pathways and Ocular Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the detection rate and spectrum of pathogenic variants (PVs) and candidate variants (variants of uncertain significance, VUS) in AVM patients.
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter cohort study, tissue and blood samples were collected from 114 patients with extracranial AVMs during treatment or when clinically indicated, for dedicated molecular genetic analyses. PVs (solved) and VUS were detected by targeted sequencing on DNA using gene panels analyzing genes suspected to be associated with AVMs. Unsolved cases were further categorized into unrestricted and restricted, with the latter reflecting methodological limitations. Subgroup analyses were carried out based on affected genes to explore associated genotype-phenotype correlations.
resultsPVs were identified in 80.7% (92/114) and VUS in 5.3% (6/114), resulting in a total detection rate of 86.0% (98/114). Unsolved cases accounted for 11.4% (13/114) including 6/13 (46.2%) with methodological restrictions. Somatic PVs were most frequent in KRAS (21.1%, 24/114), MAP2K1 (17.5%, 20/114), HRAS (8.8%, 10/114), and BRAF (7.9%, 9/114). Germline variants were found in RASA1 (7.0%, 8/114), PTEN (5.3%, 6/114), and EPHB4 (3.5%, 4/114). In a few cases, somatic variants in RASA1 (1.8%, 2/114) and PTEN (2.6%, 3/114) were identified. Additional PVs occurred in PIK3CA (3.5%, 4/114), SOS1 (2.6%, 3/114), GNAQ (1.8%, 2/114), and RIT1, RAF1, and GNA14 (each 0.9%, 1/114). Within the RAS/MAPK pathway, RAS variants (KRAS, HRAS) were linked to more severe clinical stages (65.6% vs. 40.0% MAP2K1 and 37.5% BRAF, p = 0.027) and higher relapse rates (55.6% vs. 43.8% MAP2K1 and 0% BRAF, p = 0.049). Germline variants showed a distinct distribution pattern with more syndromic presentations (61.1% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) compared to mosaic variants.
conclusionsBroad and sensitive testing enables a high detection rate of causative variants in AVMs. PVs and VUS detected reveal a broader genetic spectrum than previously recognized. Somatic RAS PVs were associated with more advanced disease stages and higher relapse rates than MAP2K1 and BRAF variants, while germline variants were more frequently linked to syndromic patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.