Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41987207›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of if-then plans - in a strict sense - to facilitate fruit and vegetable consumption in adults.

Sanne Karlsen Melum, Torsten Martiny-Huenger

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanne Karlsen MelumUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 18, Tromsø, N-9019, Norway.
Torsten Martiny-HuengerUiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 18, Tromsø, N-9019, Norway. torsten.martiny-huenger@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-2890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fruit-and-vegetable rich diet is important in the prevention of non-communicable diseases. If-then plans, or implementation intentions, are proposed to facilitate behavior change by formulating plans that link perceivable cues and goal-directed responses. We investigated the effectiveness of if-then planning interventions to facilitate fruit and vegetable intake in adults, with a strict focus on if-then planning procedures and excluded procedures representing conventional planning.

methodsA systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo; last searched April 3rd, 2025) and meta-analysis was conducted. Included studies were randomized controlled trials, testing the effect of if-then plans on fruit and/or vegetable intake against active control groups.

resultsTen articles were identified as eligible, including 12 comparisons (N = 2399) with intervention-outcome periods of 1 week to 24 months. If-then planning participants reported consuming approximately a quarter of a portion of fruit and vegetable per day more than participants in the control groups (MD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11; 0.48).

conclusionA central limitation of the analysis is that all included studies are based on self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption. While the effect size of the investigated intervention is small, its low resource requirements make it an accessible option for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorFruitHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionVegetablesAdultHumansIntentionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHealthy dietIf-then planningInterventionMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41987207
PMCPMC13195971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.