ArticleTrials2026
Guideline for the Measurement, Analysis and Reporting of Medication Adherence during the Run-in phase of clinical trials (MARMAR).
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTrial run-in phases are sometimes used to select participants into clinical trials who are most likely to remain adherent to study medications. The study designs and data analysis methods employed lack clear regulatory guidance while reporting is not consistent or transparent. This study aims to develop a consensus guideline for the Measurement, Analysis, and Reporting of Medication Adherence during the Run-in phase (MARMAR) of clinical trials.
methodsInitial "items" (specific statements relating to the measurement, analysis, and reporting of medication adherence during trial run-in phases) were generated following a systematic review of trial run-in phases. Items were split into 2 domains (methods and reporting), refined through a pilot exercise and subsequently evaluated using a two-round modified Delphi survey of international experts in medication adherence and clinical trials. Participants were recruited via e-mailing lists. In survey round one, respondents rated the importance of items across a scale labelled strongly agree to strongly disagree and provided free-text comments. In survey round two, respondents categorised items as essential or desirable and suggested alternative wording. A final consensus meeting of the research team was held to finalise the guideline. Guideline development was endorsed by the International Society for Medication Adherence (ESPACOMP) and registered with EQUATOR.
resultsIn round one, 49 respondents rated 29 items, with 64-100% (mean 86.5%) of experts scoring an item 4 or 5. Consensus was reached for 28 items, and 226 free-text comments led to merging overlapping items. In round two, 27 respondents rated 20 revised items, with 33-100% (mean 78.7%) of experts judging them essential and providing 66 free-text comments. The final MARMAR guideline comprises 20 items: 9 methodological and 11 reporting considerations for medication adherence during trial run-in phases.
conclusionThe MARMAR guideline provides the first structured, consensus-based guideline specifically focused on medication adherence during trial run-in phases. By supporting more transparent and rigorous measurement, analysis and reporting, it should serve to improve the quality of future trial run-in phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.