Observational studyJournal of translational medicine2026
An explainable multimodal machine learning model for diagnosing disorders of consciousness: evidence from a large multicenter Chinese cohort.
Observational study in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05949528 (Assessing Chronic Consciousness Disorders in Patients Using Clinical Evaluation With Resting-state EEG and ERPs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing Chronic Consciousness Disorders in Patients Using Clinical Evaluation With Resting-state EEG and ERPs: an Extensive Study Exploring Efficacy and Diagnostic Potential of EEG and ERP Measurements
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Assessment of Consciousness with Brain-Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: From Acquired Brain Injury to Neurodegenerative Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) remains a major clinical challenge in both specialized neurorehabilitation and acute care settings, where behavioral evaluations alone can lead to misdiagnosis rates of up to 40%. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable multimodal machine learning (ML) model to improve diagnostic precision in DoC.
methodsLeveraging one of the largest multicenter cohorts of patients with DoC in China to date (n = 583), together with an independent external validation set (n = 70), we examined whether routinely collected clinical indicators together with EEG features could improve diagnostic reliability. Using LASSO-based feature selection, we developed three predictive ML models (clinical, EEG, and a combined clinical-EEG model). Nine ML algorithms were tested, with hyperparameters optimized by grid search and cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was examined using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsThe combined clinical-EEG model (Model 3) consistently outperformed single-modality models. The final logistic regression-based Model 3 achieved an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68–0.85) in the training set, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61–0.92) in the internal validation set, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64–0.87) in the external validation set. SHAP analysis identified eight key features that contributed most to classification, providing biologically and clinically interpretable insights. To support clinical translation and time-sensitive decision-making, we developed a web-based tool enabling automated EEG feature extraction and individualized diagnostic predictions.
conclusionsThis study developed and validated an explainable ML model integrating clinical and EEG features to classify consciousness levels in DoC, based on the large-multicenter DoC cohorts in China. Taken together, these findings suggest that a transparent multimodal framework can strengthen the clinical evaluation of consciousness and may offer a practical template for improving assessment in complex care environments. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05949528. Registered 14 March 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05949528 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.