ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Screening for peripheral blood biomarkers and construction of a diagnostic model for adolescent depression based on metabolomics and machine learning.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of adolescent depression continues to rise, yet objective diagnostic biomarkers are lacking, with current clinical diagnosis primarily relying on subjective scales. Metabolomics offers a powerful tool for systematically revealing metabolic disturbances associated with the disease and discovering potential biomarkers.
methodsThis study enrolled 85 adolescents with depression and 46 healthy controls. Peripheral plasma samples were collected for untargeted metabolomics analysis. Differential metabolites were screened via differential analysis, and three machine learning algorithms—LASSO regression, random forest, and support vector machine—were employed for cross-validation to identify core feature metabolites. A logistic regression diagnostic model was constructed based on the selected metabolites. Its diagnostic efficacy and stability were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, 5‑fold cross‑validation, and an independent validation set.
resultsA total of 21 differential metabolites were identified. 3 core metabolites were consistently selected by the three machine learning methods: Tyrosine, 3-Hydroxy-N,N,N-trimethyl-1-propanaminium chloride and Myristoylglycine. These metabolites showed significant content differences between the two groups, and their levels correlated well with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores. A logistic regression model built with three of these metabolites demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in the training set, with an AUC of 0.944. The average AUC remained 0.936 after 5-fold cross-validation, and the independent validation set was 0.968.
conclusionThis study identified a panel of core metabolites in the peripheral blood of adolescents with depression, involving amino acid, lipid, and energy metabolism pathways. The diagnostic model based on these metabolites shows high discriminatory power, provides new insights into the metabolic mechanisms of adolescent depression, and demonstrates potential as an objective auxiliary diagnostic tool. Future external validation in multi-center, large-sample cohorts is needed to advance its clinical translation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Our study is a clinical observational study, so clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.