SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Effectiveness of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation in those with cognitive impairment: a secondary analysis of meta-analysis data.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeriatric rehabilitation reduces mortality and long-term care home (LTCH) admission. However, cognitive impairment is often perceived to be a barrier for successful rehabilitation. Our objective was to determine the impact of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcomes using a systematic review of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of geriatric rehabilitation in the inpatient settings. We screened 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the original systematic review for those that reported rehabilitation outcomes (e.g. mortality, LTCH admission) by cognitive status (high vs. low cognition as defined by score cutoff or dementia diagnosis). Results were analyzed by (i) a meta-analysis of outcomes in those with cognitive impairment and (ii) pooling the within study interaction by cognitive status.
resultsOf 29 RCTs, 8 RCTs (1134 patients) reported outcomes by cognitive status. For the subgroup of patients with cognitive impairment, the risk ratio (RR) of mortality at the longest follow up was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.45, I
conclusionsThere is no interaction between baseline cognitive status and the outcomes in this systematic review, suggesting that baseline cognitive impairment does not alter the mortality and institutionalization benefits of geriatric rehabilitation. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022345078.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.