ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Assessment of the efficiency of new regenerative gel and spray in experimental model systems.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe problem of wound healing and the availability of effective and safe agents with regenerative properties is critically important today. The aim of the study was to develop an algorithm for evaluating products with regenerative potential using a set of in vitro and in vivo experimental models.
methodsIn vitro research included methods of working with cell culture. Studies were conducted using cell lines: HaCat, MAEС, 3T3-A31. In vivo research was conducted on Wistar rats with simulation of the pathological condition of a cut wound and the application of experimental samples and the following assessment of a set of indicators.
resultsAs a result of using a comprehensive approach to assess the effectiveness of agents with regenerative activity, it was shown that the spray and gel samples, the main component of which is collagen, with decamethoxine, particles of silver sulfadiazine, hyaluronic acid, and additionally a set of amino acids in a spray, were shown to cause a statistically significant increase in the number of live cells at certain concentrations in vitro and increase the speed of restoration of the damaged monolayer of endothelial cells. According to the results of the speed of healing of the skin in the area of the simulated cut wound, a statistically significant increase in the speed of healing from 10 to 19% with the use of the spray and from 5 to 18% with the use of the gel in comparison with the animals of the control group (р≤0.05 and p ≤ 0.01). The evaluation of the results of the morphological analysis showed that with repeated application of the spray or gel, a significant reduction in the area of the wound is observed already on the 8th day with faster healing compared to the control. Already from the 8th day, inflammatory changes and the area of necrotic in the experimental groups significantly decreased.
conclusionA wound healing assessment model was developed and tested, which is convenient for monitoring the wound healing process and evaluating treatment outcomes. The efficacy and potential role in accelerating wound healing of new gel and spray products for external use was shown. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.