ArticlePhytotherapy research : PTR2026
Safety Evaluation of an Aqueous Root and Leaf Extract of Ashwagandha ( Withania somnifera ).
Article in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumer interest in botanicals as part of their diet continues to grow with many options being offered, but the public health requirement for an understanding of potential toxicity underscores the need for safety data to be developed specific to each form (i.e., plant part and extraction method). Regulatory agencies require standard toxicology tests to be documented in the public domain to assist with the transparency of informed scientific review. For ashwagandha, despite a significant number of clinical studies, there is little publicly available toxicology data available to demonstrate safety of ashwagandha root and leaf products. We completed a broad range of older legacy but Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline (TG)-compliant toxicology studies routinely recommended in regulatory safety guidelines specific to the aqueous ashwagandha root and leaf extract, Sensoril. The data summarized in this report support the conclusion that Sensoril is not toxic or genotoxic. No evidence of mutagenicity was observed in the in vitro Ames assay and Sensoril demonstrated negative findings in the in vitro micronucleus assay and in vivo mammalian bone marrow chromosome aberration assay, respectively. Sensoril was examined in rats at dose levels of 1000, 2000, and 4000 mg/kg/day over 90 days and did not exhibit mortality, morbidity, adverse clinical signs or produce test item related changes in weekly body weight, food consumption, ophthalmology, hematological or biochemical parameters. There were no test item related effects on thyroid hormones, sex hormones or microscopic pathology. The data from these studies support a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 4000 mg/kg/day in rats for an aqueous root and leaf ashwagandha extract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.