Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986866›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Social exclusion enhances the processing of emotional crowd faces: Evidence from ERPs.

Peiyao Geng, Ping Li, Nan Zhang, Wenbo Luo, Weiqi He

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peiyao Geng *Institute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Ping Li *Investigation College, Liaoning Police College, Dalian, 116036, China.
Nan ZhangInstitute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China.
Wenbo LuoInstitute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China. luowb@lnnu.edu.cn.
Weiqi HeInstitute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China. weiqi79920686@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-0360

Funding

Fundamental Research Program of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education JYTQN2023234National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970991National Natural Science Foundation of China 32020103008National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471107Scientific Research and Innovation Team of Liaoning Normal University 24TD004Technology Program Joint Program of Liaoning Province 2024-BSLH-135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social exclusion, a negative emotional experience triggered by interpersonal rejection, has detrimental effects on both social interactions and mental health. While our previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study provided causal evidence indicating that social exclusion significantly impacts the perception of crowd facial expressions, the neural correlates underlying this effect across distinct event-related potential (ERP) components remain poorly understood. To address this issue, the present study used ERPs to extend our neurophysiological insights into this phenomenon. Participants' brain activity was recorded while they performed an emotion discrimination task, viewing happy or disgust crowd faces (Experiment 1) or single faces (Experiment 2) following experiences of social inclusion or exclusion through a Cyberball game. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that social exclusion enhanced neural responses to both happy and disgust crowd faces, evidenced by larger mean amplitudes of the N170 and late positive potential (LPP) components. This neural enhancement was also correlated with greater need threat, as higher levels of need threat were associated with larger neural responses to emotional crowd faces. In contrast, Experiment 2 found no exclusion-related neural effects when participants viewed single faces. These neural results may reconcile the social reconnection hypothesis with the rejection sensitivity model by demonstrating that social exclusion increases responsiveness to socially affective information extracted from groups. In everyday social interactions, this increased responsiveness could influence how people read and evaluate emotional signals in crowds, ultimately affecting social judgment and adaptive behavior.

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionPsychological DistanceSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultCrowd facesEvent-related potentialsNeed threatRejection sensitivity modelSocial exclusionSocial reconnection hypothesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.