ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
Electroacupuncture combined with biofeedback for obstructed defecation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the therapeutic efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with biofeedback therapy (BFT) in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 296 patients with ODS, who were assigned to either a BFT group (n = 112) or an electroacupuncture plus BFT group (n = 184) according to the treatment modality received. "Post-treatment" outcomes were operationally defined as assessments performed after completion of the 10th BFT session and before initiation of the 11th session. The primary outcome was the responder rate based on mean weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs). Secondary outcomes included the Constipation Scoring System (CSS), Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome score for constipation, quality of life assessed by the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL), and pelvic floor surface electromyography (sEMG) parameters. Clinical efficacy grade was determined according to the TCM syndrome therapeutic efficacy evaluation criteria.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). The overall response rate was significantly higher in the electroacupuncture plus BFT group than in the BFT group (90.76% [167/184] vs. 80.36% [90/112], P < 0.05). Weekly CSBM responder rate was also significantly higher in the combination group (90.8% vs. 69.6%, P < 0.05). After treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in mean weekly CSBM per patient, mean weekly laxative use days, CSS scores, TCM syndrome score for constipation, PAC-QOL scores, and pelvic floor sEMG parameters compared with baseline (all P < 0.01). Improvements in TCM syndrome score for constipation, the coefficient of variation of the pre-resting baseline, post-rapid contraction relaxation time, and endurance contraction coefficient of variation were significantly greater in the combination group than in the BFT group (P < 0.05). Female patients showed smaller improvement in PAC-QOL scores than male patients (β = 4.403, P = 0.004). In the multivariable ordinal model, treatment modality was associated with higher efficacy grades, whereas laxative use during the treatment period was associated with lower efficacy grades (both P < 0.001). In addition, disease duration was positively correlated with improvements in CSS scores.
conclusionsElectroacupuncture combined with BFT is more effective than BFT alone in alleviating defecatory difficulty and improving quality of life in patients with ODS, suggesting that this combined approach has favorable clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.