ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026
Feasibility study of a robot-assisted endoscopic technique for plate osteosyntheses of the acetabulum and anterior pelvic ring.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive stabilization of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures using endoscopic techniques has become increasingly important. The logical advancement of conventional endoscopic techniques is a robot-assisted approach, which benefits from the advantages of robot-assistance systems (e.g., more degrees of freedom for instruments and improved visualization). The aim was therefore to investigate the feasibility of a robot-assisted endoscopic technique for plate osteosyntheses of the acetabulum and anterior pelvic ring. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this two-part feasibility study, four different plate osteosyntheses were performed endoscopically using the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system, first on ten synthetic pelvic models and then on ten human cadavers. During robot-assisted dissection for the preperitoneal approach, identification of ten relevant anatomical landmarks was also assessed. In both parts, the success, number of drilling errors, and time for each plate were described as learning curves and analyzed using linear regression.
resultsThe infrapectineal plate could be successfully performed in 100% of synthetic models, the posterior column plate in 100%, the suprapectineal plate in 90%, and the superior pubic ramus plate in 80%. Learning curves could be observed for the number of drilling errors per plate (e.g., 0.67 to 0, p = 0.009) and the time required, but they were mostly nonsignificant. In the ten human cadavers, all ten anatomical landmarks could be identified and all four plate osteosyntheses could be performed from the third attempt on (attempt 1: 6/10 landmarks, 3/4 plates; attempt 2: 7/10 landmarks, 3/4 plates). The time decreased for the superior pubic ramus plate (98 to 15 min, p = 0.002), suprapectineal plate (55 to 25 min, p = 0.013), infrapectineal plate (50 to 10 min, p = 0.004), and nonsignificantly for the posterior acetabular column plate (31 to 21 min). The average number of drilling errors per plate decreased nonsignificantly (1 to 0.5).
conclusionsPlate osteosynthesis for the acetabulum and anterior pelvis is feasible using a robot-assisted endoscopic technique but is more time-consuming than using a conventional endoscopic technique and is associated with technical challenges, such as screw angulation. With the development of specialized instruments for pelvic trauma surgery, endoscopic and robot-assisted techniques will likely play a significant role in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.