ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Validation of a Large Language Model Enhanced Frailty Index.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfficient, validated frailty screening tools are needed to identify high-risk older adults. The electronic frailty index (eFI), derived from diagnostic codes, may under-capture functional deficits, such as those documented in physical therapy (PT) notes.
objectiveThis study evaluated the performance of a standard eFI and an enhanced eFI— augmented with deficits extracted from PT notes using a large language model (LLM)—against a geriatrician-performed frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (FI-CGA).
designRetrospective cross-sectional study.
participantsAdults with a PT visit within 30 days prior to FI-CGA at a large health system in Boston, MA between March 2018 and September 2024. MAIN MEASURES: An LLM (GPT4o, Microsoft Azure) was prompted to extract eFI deficits from PT notes. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics characteristics and performance measures. Discrimination was assessed using AUROC with Delong’s test, and agreement was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. KEY
resultsAmong 2413 subjects, 1534 (63.6%) were frail (FI-CGA > = 0.25). The AUROCs for the enhanced eFI compared to standard eFI predicting geriatrician assessed frailty (FI-CGA) was 70.1% vs. 61.4% (p < 0.001). Pearson correlations were 0.756 for the eFI vs. enhanced eFI, 0.239 for the eFI vs. FI-CGA, and 0.365 for the enhanced eFI vs. FI-CGA.
conclusionsAn LLM-enhanced eFI incorporating functional deficits from PT notes demonstrated improved discrimination and stronger correlation with FI-CGA compared to the standard eFI. Leveraging unstructured narratives from PT notes may improve identification of vulnerable older adults who benefit from early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41986765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.