ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Integrative fragmentomic and mutational signature profile of plasma cfDNA for early lung cancer detection.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting lung cancer effectively in the general population is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the 5-year survival rate. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the current standard, it has limitations in broader populations. We developed a blood-based multi-omics model using whole-genome cell-free DNA (cfDNA) features to distinguish lung cancer from non-cancer individuals. This study included 1600 patients and an equal number of non-cancer controls, divided into training and validation cohorts. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 95.59% for the training cohort and 95.74% for the validation cohort. The model consistently performed well across various cancer stages and histological subtypes. To further validate the performance of the model, an external validation cohort was utilized. Notably, it also effectively differentiated non-cancer samples from cancer samples in the external validation cohort, with 85.9% sensitivity and 94.78% specificity. Importantly, in simulated population screenings, our ctDNA assay outperformed both LDCT and a previously established method. This suggests its potential utility in wider lung cancer screening programs, possibly complementing the LDCT approach. In conclusion, our ctDNA assay emerges as a promising and highly sensitive tool for the early detection and categorization of lung cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.