Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986580›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2026

Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for RRMM in the Japan expansion cohort of the phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial.

Tomoaki Fujisaki, Kohmei Kubo, Yasushi Hiramatsu, Ryosuke Ogawa, Taeko Yonekawa, Akira Endo, Hirofumi Nakano, Joe Lee, Lydia Eccersley, Hena Baig and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04246047 (DREAMM 7), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04246047 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

DREAMM 7: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (B-Vd) Compared With the Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (D-Vd) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2020 to 2028Enrolled494ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsBelantamab mafodotin, Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomoaki FujisakiMatsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Ehime, Japan. tfujisak@outlook.com.
Kohmei KuboAomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Yasushi HiramatsuJapanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Ryosuke OgawaJCHO Kyushu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taeko YonekawaGSK, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira EndoGSK, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi NakanoGSK, Tokyo, Japan.
Joe LeeGSK, London, UK.
Lydia EccersleyGSK, London, UK.
Hena BaigGSK, Ontario, Mississauga, Canada.
Eric LewisGSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Taku FujiiGSK, Tokyo, Japan. taku.2.fujii@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2420-2200

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline 207503Wellcome Trust 207503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The randomized, phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial (NCT04246047) previously demonstrated the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and ≥ 1 prior therapy. The results in the Japan expansion cohort of DREAMM-7, consisting of 24 patients randomized to receive BVd (N = 10) or DVd (N = 14), are presented here. The median follow-up was 19.4 months (range, 1.3-30.3). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 7.0-NR) with BVd versus 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.9-NR) with DVd (PFS hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.11-1.52). The overall response rate was 90.0% (95% CI, 55.5-99.7) versus 71.4% (95% CI, 41.9-91.6); median duration of response was NR (95% CI, 9.7-NR) versus 14.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-NR). Safety trends in the Japan expansion cohort were similar to those in the global cohort. Ocular adverse reactions were more common with BVd and were manageable with dose modification. No new safety signals were reported. As in the global cohort, results in the Japan expansion cohort demonstrated the safety and efficacy of BVd in patients with RRMM and ≥ 1 prior therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsMultiple MyelomaAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBortezomibDexamethasoneFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedbelantamab mafodotinBortezomibDexamethasoneAnti–b-cell maturation antigenBelantamab mafodotinDaratumumabMonoclonal antibodiesMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID41986580
PMCPMC13529901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.