Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986575›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Clashing memories in working memory modulate serial dependence.

Björk Wanjiru Reynisdóttir, Eva Rós Gústafsdóttir, Rut Þorsteinsdóttir, Sabrina Hansmann-Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Björk Wanjiru Reynisdóttir *Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Eva Rós Gústafsdóttir *Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Rut Þorsteinsdóttir *Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Sabrina Hansmann-RothDepartment of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland. sabrina@hi.is.

Funding

Háskóli Íslands 92361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial dependence describes how prior and current stimuli interact, producing attractive biases toward previously seen inputs, particularly under uncertainty. Previous studies varied external stimulus noise; here we manipulated the quality of internal representations through an intermediate task during the retention interval. Participants viewed oriented Gabor patches and reproduced their orientation after a delay, during which they either performed a control task or judged circle size, line length/orientation, or tone frequency. These manipulations allowed for a detailed assessment of the role of working memory load and inter-item competition on the fidelity of the encoded Gabor orientation and subsequently, on the strength of serial dependence. Tasks requiring additional encoding increased serial dependence, even when the task was auditory. Increased working memory load is known to alter the quality and accessibility of maintained representations, which may enhance the influence of prior stimuli on current stimulus perception. However, the similarity of the feature dimension did not further increase serial dependence, though it did increase response variability. These findings offer novel evidence that increased working memory load, not just stimulus noise, enhances biases towards past input, shaping serial dependence through internal uncertainty.

Indexed as

Memory loadMemory representationsPrecisionSerial dependenceUncertaintyVisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID41986575
PMCPMC13237100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.