ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Systematic review on anticancer potential of Kaempferol and quercetin against lung, breast, and colorectal cancers with emphasis on in vitro and in vivo studies.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlant-based bioactive compounds, particularly kaempferol and quercetin, exhibit notable anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential.
methodsThis systematic review evaluates experimental evidence on the effects of kaempferol and quercetin, in pure and isolated forms, against lung, breast, and colorectal cancers using in vitro and in vivo models. A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Taylor & Francis, and Wiley Online Library was conducted in October 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating pure kaempferol or quercetin in human-derived cancer cell lines and animal models were included, while clinical and combination studies were excluded. Only quercetin-based in vivo studies met eligibility criteria. Out of 377 identified records, 24 studies were included.
resultsBoth compounds consistently reduced cancer cell viability, induced apoptosis. They inhibited proliferation and migration by modulating the PI3K/Akt, MAPK, NF-κB, and p53 pathways across breast, lung, and colorectal cancer cell lines. Among the included studies, 16 were in vitro, and 8 were in vivo, with predominantly low risk of bias, indicating robust methodological quality.
conclusionOverall, kaempferol and quercetin demonstrate strong anticancer activity in preclinical models, highlighting their promise for cancer prevention and management. However, well-designed clinical trials are needed to confirm their potential therapeutic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.