Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986553›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Trait and state predictors of the intensity of emotions experienced in everyday dreams: a multilevel approach.

Jess M Williams, Jessica Bourgin, Jessica Varennes, Marine Pedreni, Melodie Bulinski, Mark Blagrove, Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jess M Williams *School of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jessica Bourgin *Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Jessica VarennesUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Marine PedreniUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Melodie BulinskiUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Mark BlagroveSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jean-Baptiste EichenlaubUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000, Grenoble, France. jean-baptiste.eichenlaub@univ-smb.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the dream literature, the emotional continuity hypothesis postulates that emotions in dreams are a reflection of emotions experienced in waking life. However, while between-subject bivariate correlations have been extensively investigated, the trait factors across individuals as well as the state factors within individuals that account for night-to-night variation in dream affect have been understudied. In the present study, a multilevel analysis was applied to investigate the association of waking trait- and state-variables with night-to-night variation in dream emotions (N = 130 participants; mean age = 20.57 ± 3.09). Daily sleep quality significantly predicted positive emotions in dreams. In addition, within-subject variation in daily stress and sleep quality, as well as the trait sensory processing sensitivity, significantly predicted negative emotions in dreams. Together, our results highlight the involvement of both trait and state factors in dream emotions, but also bring into focus the differential association of these factors depending on the emotional valence experienced in dreams.

Indexed as

DreamingEmotionMultilevel modelsSensory processing sensitivitySleep qualityTrait and state variables

Identifiers

PMID41986553
PMCPMC13243564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.