ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Olfactory assessment in treatment and survivor groups of pediatric solid malignancies.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimChildren with cancer who have received or are receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy are at risk of serious effects of their treatments. Although most of these problems are well documented, the same cannot be said for the sense of smell. We aimed to determine whether there is a decrease in smell function in children with solid tumor malignancies who are currently undergoing or are survivors, using a specially designed, validated quantitative smell test for children. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty children with solid tumor (31 post-treatment and 29 current treatment) and 25 healthy controls were administered the Pediatric Smell Wheel®. Health-related quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL).
resultsThe cancer study group had significantly lower PSW scores than the control group [respective means (95% CIs) = 8.85 (8.43;9.17) and 10.32 (9.91;10.73); p < 0.001]. Twenty-two (36%) had scores less than 9, indicating the presence of olfactory dysfunction. PSW scores did not differ between patients with or without surgery and with or without radiotherapy (respective ps = 0.51 and 0.94). A weak positive correlation between PSW scores and the self-ratings of smell ability was present (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). Although lower QOL scores were found for the study group than for the controls for each domain (p < 0.01), such scores were not significantly correlated with those of the PSW.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that treatments for solid tumors of a variety of types significantly impact the ability of children to smell. The real-life implications of such deficits are yet to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.