ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of an early risk prediction model based on inflammatory and metabolically derived markers for early diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progression of early diagnostic markers for diabetic kidney disease: From single-indicator detection to multi-omics integration modeling.Current research in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the global prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) continuing to rise, its early diagnosis remains challenging due to the limitations of existing clinical methods. This study integrates pathological diagnostic data using machine learning (ML), employing feature selection, multi-model comparison, and model evaluation to construct a high-precision early prediction model. This retrospective study enrolled patients from Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, including individuals newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and those pathologically confirmed with DKD. A machine learning-compatible dataset was constructed, comprising 209 cases in the training set and 42 cases in the external validation set. Key predictors were screened using univariate logistic regression and Lasso regression. ML algorithms, including XGBoost, random forest, and logistic regression, were employed to construct models. A comparative analysis of binary classification models revealed that the XGBoost model achieved optimal diagnostic performance. The model underwent internal cross-validation and external multicenter validation, with performance evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity and specificity, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves to assess discriminative power and clinical utility. 1. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in hematological and biochemical parameters were observed between the DKD and DM groups. Independent risk factors for DKD included the Uric Acid to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio (UHR), Neutrophil to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio (NHR), Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII), Homocysteine (HCY), Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), and Albumin (ALB). 2. The XGBoost model, constructed using key variables, outperformed other models in both training and validation sets. Internal validation yielded an AUC of 0.83, while external validation yielded 0.80. Critical predictors (HCY, UHR, NHR) exhibited AUC values of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.78, respectively. The model demonstrated balanced performance with sensitivity (0.63), specificity (0.90), and accuracy (77%), confirming its robust diagnostic capability. The XGBoost-based diagnostic prediction model effectively integrates novel inflammatory and metabolic indicators, enabling high-precision early diagnosis of DKD with significant clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.