ArticleScientific reports2026
The radiological impacts of radioactivity in the Crown Mines gold tailings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mining is the main source of environmental radioactivity in areas where nuclear weapons tests are not conducted. The dispersion of radioactivity in the form of dust is inevitable for residents living near mine tailings. There have been complaints in areas such as Riverlea, in Soweto, Johannesburg, about dust pollution causing skin irritations and severe respiratory problems. The area is very close to the gold mine tailings. Soil samples were randomly collected from the Crown Mines gold tailings and the abandoned mines located west of Johannesburg, behind Soccer City Stadium. The specific activity was assessed using coaxial HPGe γ-spectroscopy, which measured the γ-signals in the soil samples, and the comprehensive radiological indices were subsequently evaluated. The results showed that the mean activity concentrations in some samples exceeded the global average, particularly for radium. The average concentrations of [Formula: see text]Ra, [Formula: see text]Th, and [Formula: see text]K were 302.99 ± 6.60, 8.25 ± 1.31, and 113.34 ± 20.80 Bq/kg, respectively. The average radiological indices exceeded their globally recommended values with the values of 1006.34 ± 22.10 [Formula: see text]Sv/y for AGDE, 323.50 ± 7.04 Bq/kg for Ra[Formula: see text], 293.98 ± 6.40 nGy/h for ADR, 5.05 ± 0.11 [Formula: see text] for ELCR, 1.69 ± 0.05 for H[Formula: see text], 1.44 ± 0.03 mSv/y for AEDE, 1.09 ± 0.04 for I[Formula: see text] and 1.51 ± 0.03 for I[Formula: see text]. Statistical analyses, including skewness, kurtosis, Pearson correlation coefficients, and ANOVA, were used to characterise radionuclide distributions and relationships. The Pearson correlation matrix revealed a strong positive correlation between [Formula: see text]Ra and all estimated radiological hazard indices, while [Formula: see text]Th and [Formula: see text]K showed a weak but positive correlation with [Formula: see text]Ra and all indices. These findings suggest that radioactivity from the ambient geology of the mining tailings under survey poses a serious health risk, even if the impacts are not immediate. Therefore, close monitoring and evaluation of these tailings are necessary to ensure that residents' exposure remains as low as reasonably achievable. These are significant indicators of potential harm to human health, wildlife, and ecosystems, as ionising radiation can damage living cells and genetic material, specifically DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.