ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Spectrum, pathobiology, mechanistic insights and diagnostic challenges of post-CAR T cell therapy lymphoproliferative disorders.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondary peripheral T-cell lymphoma in a patient with DLBCL harboringJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is now widely used for the treatment of various haematological malignancies, with emerging applications in solid tumours and autoimmune diseases. Alongside its demonstrated clinical activity, this therapeutic modality has a toxicity profile that differs from those associated with traditional cytotoxic therapies, other immunotherapies, and even other cell therapy approaches such as allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. One increasingly recognized yet poorly understood complication is the development of post-CAR T cell therapy lymphoproliferative and lymphomatous disorders, which have a clinical and biological spectrum that remains incompletely characterized. These rare events include both CAR-transgene-positive and transgene-negative lymphomas with variable and sometimes overlapping clinical features. Causal attribution is difficult, given that these proliferations often emerge in the context of clonal haematopoiesis, inflammatory or infectious triggers, immune suppression and/or viral reactivation. In this Review, we synthesize the growing body of evidence on post-CAR T cell therapy lymphoproliferative disorders, drawing on the limited but increasing number of well-characterized cases. We outline the spectrum of lymphoproliferations described so far, highlight recurrent pathological and molecular features, and discuss factors that might promote clonal expansion or transformation, including pre-existing clonal haematopoiesis, dysregulated signalling pathways, inflammatory stimuli and, rarely, CAR-transgene vector integration. A clearer framework for these disorders might improve early recognition, guide diagnostic evaluation, support treatment decision-making, facilitate classification and consensus-building efforts, and inform future mechanistic studies and pharmacovigilance efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41986503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.