ArticleScientific reports2026
Early-warning industrial fault detection based on physics-guided residual learning and calibrated CRNNs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enabling generalizable RUL prediction for equipment: a dual-dimensional continual learning approach based on deep Gaussian process.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel image-free arc detection method for pantograph-catenary systems based on direct DWT-ANN signal analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A temporal-spectral dual-stream anti-noise bearing fault diagnosis model based on adaptive mode decomposition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feature decoupling and cross domain alignment with transfer learning for cross working condition mechanical fault diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial plants generate high volume multivariate sensor time series where early fault detection must be accurate, governable and explainable under regime changes, sensor correlations and drift. Many published Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP) studies report strong receiver operating characteristic (ROC) or accuracy but provide limited evidence for calibrated probabilities, uncertainty bounds and actionable sensor level diagnostics, so alarm thresholds remain ad hoc and difficult to defend in control rooms. To address this issue, we propose a physics guided pipeline that combines twin based residuals with compact rolling and spectral descriptors and an attention based convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN). The proposed method is also compared against state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines to establish its relative effectiveness under the same evaluation setting. Residuals highlight deviations from physics consistent behavior, while a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (Conv1D) and bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) encoder with attention models short and long temporal structure over 120 step windows. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) guided feature selection reduces redundancy and improves interpretability, Optuna stabilizes training and Platt scaling calibrates anomaly probabilities for policy driven thresholding under a false alarm budget. Reliability is quantified with 1000 block bootstrap bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confidence intervals. On a run level 70/20/10 split of Tennessee Eastman Process runs, the method achieves about 99.0% accuracy with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) near 1.00, macro F1-score of 0.93 ± 0.02 and expected calibration error (ECE) reduced to ≈ 0.03 after calibration. Early warning governance improves the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) score by 17% over an Isolation Forest baseline and supports low nuisance alarm operation. These results show that residual-guided learning plus calibrated decision governance can support deployment-oriented industrial monitoring by enabling auditable thresholds and operator-facing explanations within the Tennessee Eastman benchmark setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.