ArticleCommunications biology2026
Genomic signatures of migratory preference and historical whaling in eastern South Pacific humpback whales.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic signatures of migratory preference and historical whaling in eastern South Pacific humpback whales.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the genetic consequences of migratory behavior and drastic population contractions is essential for the conservation of baleen whales. Here, we investigated population structure and demographic history of eastern South Pacific humpback whales using whole genomes across two feeding and one breeding ground. Nuclear genomic analyses revealed no clear population structure between feeding grounds, suggesting high gene flow and panmixia, despite divergent migratory destinations. However, mitogenomic data showed strong clustering of the different feeding grounds, likely reflecting strong female-driven transgenerational tradition in seasonal migration. Demographic reconstructions identified a population expansion after the Last Glacial Maximum and a pronounced recent population decline consistent with industrial unsustainable whaling in the early 20th century. Despite this bottleneck, current genome-wide diversity remains substantial, possibly reflecting the buffering effect of humpback's long generation time. Nevertheless, the full genetic consequences of this demographic contraction may not yet be apparent and could become evident in subsequent generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.