ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of biomarkers in myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis via integrated transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic profiling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis (MHF) are key structural changes in adverse cardiac remodeling. They are commonly observed in hypertension, metabolic disorders, and cardiomyopathies. These processes contribute to heart failure and sudden death, yet their molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We established in vivo and in vitro models of MHF and performed transcriptomic and label-free phosphoproteomic sequencing. These data were integrated with public single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. This multi-tier strategy enabled us to move beyond bulk-tissue signals and prioritize candidates based on cross-omics concordance and cell-type-specific expression. We identified five candidate biomarkers, CLIP2, PLA2G4A, PRRX1, SLAIN2, and XPO1. These candidates showed coordinated upregulation or downregulation at both the transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic levels. They were also specifically enriched in disease-relevant cardiac cell populations, including cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. PRRX1 and PLA2G4A were enriched in fibrogenic fibroblast subsets and increased along activation trajectories. XPO1 and SLAIN2 were downregulated in cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, suggesting impaired nuclear export and cytoskeletal regulation. Molecular docking revealed flurandrenolide and selinexor as potential modulators of PLA2G4A and XPO1 respectively. However, their cardiovascular safety and efficiency remain uncertain. Notably, the therapeutic implications of XPO1 modulation appear context-dependent, warranting careful evaluation of its functional role in specific MHF etiologies. Overall, these findings highlight novel targets and provide mechanistic insights into MHF progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.