Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41986443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intelligent classification with marine predators algorithm and probabilistic neural networks.

Ahmad Iskandar, Hasan Rashaideh, Mohammed Alweshah, Sofian Kassaymeh, Muder Almiani, Saleh Alkhalaileh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad IskandarPrince Abdullah Bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Hasan RashaidehPrince Abdullah Bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Mohammed AlweshahPrince Abdullah Bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Sofian KassaymehDepartment of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology, Jadara University, Irbid, Jordan. s.kassaymeh@jadara.edu.jo.
Muder AlmianiDepartment of Management Information System (MIS), Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Saleh AlkhalailehPrince Abdullah Bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The probabilistic neural network technique is a popular data mining process that is used for addressing a variety of classification, prediction, and pattern recognition challenges. One strategy to increase the accuracy of classification is to modify the probabilistic neural network classifier’s weights using optimization techniques. Metaheuristic algorithms have demonstrated their robustness in addressing a variety of engineering challenges. As a result, multiple researchers have utilized metaheuristic algorithms to improve the search process in order to train artificial neural networks in recent years. In this work, the marine predator metaheuristic algorithm is applied. Eleven benchmark classification datasets are used to assess how well the marine predators algorithm performs in adjusting the probabilistic neural network parameters (weights and biases). The proposed method (MPA-PNN) was compared with probabilistic neural network along with three additional strategies from the literature: african buffalo optimizer, hill climbing, and coronavirus herd immunity algorithms. The findings demonstrate that integrating MPA significantly enhances the classification accuracy of the standard PNN. When benchmarked against three prominent metaheuristic-based PNN hybrids from recent literature–namely CHIO-PNN, ABO-PNN, and B-HC-PNN–the proposed MPA-PNN model achieved superior or competitive accuracy on the majority of the 11 UCI datasets evaluated, attaining the highest average accuracy of 91.047%. Furthermore, the results indicate that MPA-PNN exhibits faster and more stable convergence compared to the baseline PNN. While these findings are promising within the specific niche of metaheuristic optimization for PNNs, we acknowledge that further validation against a broader set of contemporary classifiers, such as gradient boosting machines, is a necessary direction for future work to fully establish its generalizability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerPredatory BehaviorAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsPrediction AlgorithmsSoft ComputingClassifier optimizationHybrid intelligent systemsMarine predators algorithmMetaheuristic optimizationProbabilistic neural networkWeight optimization

Identifiers

PMID41986443
PMCPMC13237101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.