ArticleScientific reports2026
Uterine rupture risk during trial of labor after one cesarean in a population-based cohort study of induction method and labor management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induction of labor after one previous cesarean: Time for the MIBAC trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Scar tenderness as a sensitive marker for uterine scar dehiscence or uterine rupture.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prior cesarean section is the primary risk factor for uterine rupture in a trial of labor after cesarean, a rare event associated with severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This population-based cohort study aimed to determine the risk of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after one previous cesarean section in the Stockholm-Gotland Region and to examine associations between induction methods, labor management, and rupture risk. The cohort included 11,947 women with a cephalic-presenting, singleton infant at ≥ 37 + 0/6 weeks of gestation. Incidence of uterine rupture was calculated by labor onset and management strategies. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between labor characteristics, uterine rupture, and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Overall, 216 (1.8%) women experienced uterine rupture. Induction of labor was associated with higher odds of rupture than spontaneous onset (aOR 1.63; 95% CI 1.20–2.22). Prostaglandin induction showed 2.6-fold increased odds (aOR 2.58; 95% CI 1.77–3.74), while balloon catheter showed no association (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.61–1.61). Prostaglandin use was thus linked to increased risk of uterine rupture, whereas balloon catheter induction was not. When induction is necessary, mechanical methods may be safer, though vigilant monitoring remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.