ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid pythagorean fuzzy decision-making model for evaluating corporate environmental behavior through social responsibility dimensions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of the corporate environmental conduct in the context of social responsibility is a complex decision-making (DM) problem because of the contradictory evaluation criteria, qualitative judgments, and enormous uncertainties in the professional evaluation. The current methods of assessment do not capture expert hesitation well as well as fail to give balanced and transparent ranking of corporate environmental performance. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper will propose a problem-focused hybrid DM framework by combining the Pythagorean Fuzzy (PF) Analytic hierarchy Process (AHP) with Multi-Attribute Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) system.The expressive weaknesses of classical and intuitionistic fuzzy environments will be overcome by using pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFS). PF-AHP method is applied to obtain credible and uniform weights of social responsibility-based environmental criteria, and the MAIRCA methodology provides an objective and balanced ranking of corporate options by comparing ideal and real performances profile. Hypothetical case study is performed on six corporations with six evaluation criteria to demonstrate the relevance and usefulness of the proposed framework to decision support. The findings demonstrate that the proposed model of PF-AHP-MAIRCA has a higher level of discriminative power, transparency, and realistic decision support than any of the currently applicable fuzzy MCDM methods. The framework can provide useful information to corporate managers and policymakers who want to understand and compare corporate environmental behavior and improve it in accordance with the goals of social responsibility and sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.